[OK] shortest 100% games

just for games with 100% completion gta iii days passed in game x (-) gta iv playing time x:xx:xx (-) (hours:minutes:seconds) gta the ballad of gay tony playing time x:xx:xx (-) (hours:minutes:seconds) gta the lost and damned playing time x:xx:xx (-) (hours:minutes:seconds) gta liberty city stories (ps2) total playing time x:xx (-) (hours:minutes) days passed in game x (-) gta liberty city stories (psp) total playing time x:xx (-) (hours:minutes) days passed in game x (-) gta san andreas playing time x:xx (-) (hours:minutes) days passed in game x (-) gta vice city playing time x:xx (-) (hours:minutes) days passed in game x (-) gta vice city stories (ps2) total playing time x (-) (hours:minutes) days passed in game x (-) gta vice city stories (psp) total playing time x (-) (hours:minutes) days passed in game x (-) red dead redemption total time played x:xx:xx:xx (-) (days:hours:minutes:seconds) days passed x (-) red dead redemption undead nightmare total time played x:xx:xx:xx (-) (days:hours:minutes:seconds) days passed x (-) sleeping dogs total playtime x:xx:xx (-) (hours:minutes:seconds) they're all easily provable. in gta v it's a little bit weird. shall we combine all 3 characters times? [url=http://postimg.org/image/lvttvmbuh/]picture[/url]

You would have to put the 3 characters separate on gta v. The records have to be exactly what the game says, you aren't allowed records which require maths

so it's the best to complete the game 3 times, everytime avoid using 1 of the characters as much as possible, lol, ok, then... GTA V 100% game, using Franklin least x:xx:xx:xx (-) (days:hours:minutes:seconds) 100% game, using Michael least x:xx:xx:xx (-) (days:hours:minutes:seconds) 100% game, using Trevor least x:xx:xx:xx (-) (days:hours:minutes:seconds)

You could look at it as the quickest time to complete each characters missions. I wanted to add it but didn't find it to be the most logical record in the end. Also you need to put 100% completion time for each record

no, i really disapprove of it. if someone manages to do a gold medal and makes a screenshot of his statistics u can't know if he did everything (e. g. time, accuracy, fastest speed, getaway time etc.) in 1 try unless he makes an uncomfortable in-gameplay screenshot or video.

gta san andreas playing time x:xx (-) (hours:minutes) days passed in game x (-) What's the difference?

[url=http://postimg.org/image/mb6o2t56l/]that's the difference.[/url] playing time can be good if u're fast (and it doesn't matter how often u save), days passed can be good, if u're fast and don't need many saves, cause saving costs 6 hours.

I think it's ok then but I need to know if I must do a new group (with the name) for each records or in which group I must add them.

They probably should go in a new group called 100% completion time

ok, the best is, in all gtas we put the new records there where the stunts are. in gta iii, lcs (psp) and lcs (ps2) there's just the category "all records". in episodes of lc we put it in "the ballad of gay tony stats" and "the lost and damned stats". in gta iv, vcs (psp) and vcs (ps2) in "stats", in gta v, sa and vc in "stunts". (maybe it's better to rename these categories also in stats.) in rdr and rdr un in "general" and in sleeping dogs in "stats games".

Almost everything is added. I agree with PSR for GTA V so I have not added GTA V records. Also next time if you don't do a proper add request and you don't speek english properly I will not do anything. You must remember that we are on a forum and on a forum, we make correct sentences.