In the Groove PC
10 messages normal
What means that? Double Tap for Double mode? If yes, is a mode in where players have to use 2 panels to make scores and many DDR games have this mode.
If you don't know what it is, this is the answer. Is the same for ITG and DDR games. So, multiplayers are not applied in these kind of games. You just play in 2 panels.
In the Groove (PC)
Please add the game's link, next time.
Can you detect multiplayer use with a video ?
Like the one given with Zimer's link ?
Or maybe with a video showing your moves (in a dancing carpet, or with pad ?), you probably can proove you were alone, right ?
If yes, you can ask for 1 or 2 videos to every members who have platinum medals there (so “only” 4 members) .
And since v7, you can suggest to change Game's Rules there and apply “video proof” obligation (for example).
But then you need to have a majority of players agreement, by a public vote in the game's forum.
Basically, you have to trust what was done in the past by others. If there is no deactivated scores done, then you can probably trust them because nobody asked proofs in the past.
I checked that some players like Javier95, Kirby54 or…Triple HHH have no proof in all this game. 😕
Which became now suspicious (since v6, in fact), moreover if they have gold or platinum medals, and dozen of scores.
Don't hesitate to ask for proof (picture or video) if you have any doubt on scores there.
I think the possibility of multiplayer use with double tap is not a sufficient reason to ask the deletion of the concerned records. You should use proofs ask system, or maybe change Game's Rules.
I think the possibility of multiplayer use with double tap is not a sufficient reason to ask the deletion of the concerned records. You should use proofs ask system, or maybe change Game's Rules. Zephyraz
I try to help that the site becomes better, we can play with 8 fingers without problem ;) I also try to make life easier for evidence admins ^^.
I don't have game anymore but I proved all scores. Zimer
well see as if by chance, it's not been 10 years yet you…
I ask very small proof in my past, because all member are Legit, which is no longer the case…
Triple HHH: I ask very small proof in my past, because all member are Legit, which is no longer the case…
Well… I can't let you say this, I disagree. 🤨
Sorry but you are not well placed to say this, because today you have still more than 30 deactivated scores, and you only have 5,3% (or 6% soon, probably), which is really far from others.
In fact, in the Top 100 Proofs, only 4 members have a worse proof rate than you.
So, sorry but I prefer to trust the 96% other members than your own legitimacy.
Again, if you think there is no legit score somewhere, please ask explanations to the concerned members, and eventually detail it after in Cheater's topic.
If video proof are necessary for some good reasons, you can also simply invite the member to explain by Personal Message.
If you estimate that's not enough, and video proof are mandatory, then say it on public forum.
Note that you should reasonably accept what was done in the past: if nobody asked proofs or explanations before, moreover if there is many other members in the concerned game, there is a strong probability that scores are legit.
We are all human. Nobody's perfect, and nobody knows all the 5000 games specificities.
There can be lack of proofs (or video proofs) somewhere, but this was due to the initial choices of this site (and you was part of it, I suppose).
We need to assume this, and make the situation better now, for example by prooving a lot of our scores.
First, start changing things in your own profile.
After, check profiles and games, and help us to know where you think there is suspicion, this will always helps the site.
Thanks for your participation. 🙂
Well… I can't let you say this, I disagree. 🤨
Sorry but you are not well placed to say this, because today you have still more than 30 deactivated scores, and you only have 5,3% (or 6% soon, probably), which is really far from others. Zephyraz
again, statistics that represent nothing because you do not take into account the human factor. You only prove to me who is aware of the news rules, (the absentees always twist) but you do not prove who cheats or not…
The Staff evidence has let this pass and after you will tell me that it is up to me to trust you? error 2019 i see this in 3 days. so for now you only prove to me that the Staff is not rigorous enough. I could have chosen another word, but forbidding me only out of respect for VGR