[OK] Pokémon Rumble Blast
67 messaggio/i normal
Visualizzazione da 21 a 40 di 67 elementi
11/01/2012 00:55
#21
we can do it like the Wii Version of Pokemon Rumble, i dont think we need to add numbers because they are not shown in the Game and for me would be harder to check what Pokemon are named in english (because i play the Game in german and change the Language later in english if the Game is listed)
I still dont know all Pokemon 100%, so i can only post right if i see a proof picture of of other Gamer, but i think im the only 1 again post any pictures, so... ._.
So i think its better to use a alphabetically list like in Pokemon Rumble Wii
You can change the list ingame into Pokedex like(without numbers) or alphabetically
I still dont know all Pokemon 100%, so i can only post right if i see a proof picture of of other Gamer, but i think im the only 1 again post any pictures, so... ._.
So i think its better to use a alphabetically list like in Pokemon Rumble Wii
viviengaetan :
If you want the pokemon to be in the order they are in the game, we'll have to add a number...
You can change the list ingame into Pokedex like(without numbers) or alphabetically
11/01/2012 02:25
#22
I prefer add the number. The great thing about do it in alphabetical order is:
When you are selling them, you can sell 7 and get a new one! If you do it alphabetical, U will need to go to where the evolution is on the list, and see if the new one is the best, or can be sold to.
This make all so difficult in Pokemon Rumble, I prefer correct and do it with numbers in Rumble Blast.
When you are selling them, you can sell 7 and get a new one! If you do it alphabetical, U will need to go to where the evolution is on the list, and see if the new one is the best, or can be sold to.
This make all so difficult in Pokemon Rumble, I prefer correct and do it with numbers in Rumble Blast.
11/01/2012 14:35
#24
11/01/2012 19:24
#25
11/01/2012 21:15
#26
11/01/2012 21:18
#27
12/01/2012 12:05
#28
12/01/2012 15:37
#29
12/01/2012 18:12
#30
13/01/2012 15:32
#31
STL - it should be deleted
It really is a bad idea for a record, and shouldn't have been added on the original.
With the exception of you refusing to discuss the matter with STL simply because he doesn't agree with you, I have no issue with anything else in the topic
If that's the case, that would make it cumulative and not even allowed yeah?
MiMo :
You need various tries, and I great ability to search and capture.
It´s a record that depends of lucky...like MANY AND MANY others!
It really is a bad idea for a record, and shouldn't have been added on the original.
With the exception of you refusing to discuss the matter with STL simply because he doesn't agree with you, I have no issue with anything else in the topic
viviengaetan :
In fact STL is right, in what a Higher Pokémon Level is a record?
It's the one who spend the most time of his life who win if I understand?
If that's the case, that would make it cumulative and not even allowed yeah?
13/01/2012 15:50
#32
thelegendarypsr :
If that's the case, that would make it cumulative and not even allowed yeah?
It is not a cumulative because how i got told you can't change the level of a pokemon after you catched it. So it's basically the same as highest level of wild pokemon at the time you find it in the other pokemon games.
13/01/2012 16:08
#33
On an unrelated note, exactly how many records are there going to be for the game? I'm just wondering more than anything
Okay, and since that's not in any of the other games, I can't see how it can be accepted here as it's such a terrible record.
super_toon_link :
thelegendarypsr :
If that's the case, that would make it cumulative and not even allowed yeah?
It is not a cumulative because how i got told you can't change the level of a pokemon after you catched it. So it's basically the same as highest level of wild pokemon at the time you find it in the other pokemon games.
Okay, and since that's not in any of the other games, I can't see how it can be accepted here as it's such a terrible record.
14/01/2012 21:26
#34
Ok...STL..it´s simple...You need to catch the best one...just that!
Its something that need a lot of work...ok?!
It´s just the same mechanic of Pokemon Rumble WiiWare.
You want to talk about random and lucky? How about Zelda WW, the bombship game?
How about 101-in-1 minigames?
How about catch the 35 pound fish in zelda oot?
ALL RANDOM OR LUCKY!
Its something that need a lot of work...ok?!
It´s just the same mechanic of Pokemon Rumble WiiWare.
You want to talk about random and lucky? How about Zelda WW, the bombship game?
How about 101-in-1 minigames?
How about catch the 35 pound fish in zelda oot?
ALL RANDOM OR LUCKY!
14/01/2012 22:46
#35
i think some ppl here never played Pokemon Rumble, you guys just see the lucky part, but at all its work like play the same Game ever and ever to get a better result.
What about the stupid idea of speedrunning a Mario Game in the middle of a lv?
What about all Max score Games that you reach if you just kill any enemys?
What about luck based glitches, is a Gamer good, because he know(or unknow) to use a lucky glitch?
I know stl is right with the luck part but MiMo is right too, we have here many scores with a high amount of luck needed and low amound of skill needed to get the best score/time. But its different how many time you need to reach it.
What about the stupid idea of speedrunning a Mario Game in the middle of a lv?
What about all Max score Games that you reach if you just kill any enemys?
What about luck based glitches, is a Gamer good, because he know(or unknow) to use a lucky glitch?
I know stl is right with the luck part but MiMo is right too, we have here many scores with a high amount of luck needed and low amound of skill needed to get the best score/time. But its different how many time you need to reach it.
15/01/2012 00:31
#36
15/01/2012 02:58
#37
Visualizzazione da 21 a 40 di 67 elementi
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
