Demandes de preuves refusées (en partie)
49 messaggio/i normal
Visualizzazione da 41 a 49 di 49 elementi
19/11/2012 23:14
#41
Just trying to make you understand one thing: Why do you consider your time as Mario Kart 7 low, while elsewhere you have not proven a record supperior to others? I do not understand the logic there. When someone asks you a proof for a folder, it is your responsibility to have developed a proof aside in case a high score or time is requested by a player. Since you already have time off on Mario Kart 7, it is normal that in a big game where people play over 20 you are asked to prove some of your time on the decks. That Pkaddict wanted to know: If your most of your time are real or fakes. Considering that it had no answer for the first two records, he was told to ask for proof all your turntables thinking in his mind that he would rather see people who deserve their turntables and first place in a racing game that requires a lot of adaptation to build impressive time even if you're not in the top 10 of them.
I can understand now why you were not able to provide me with proof of your shutout cut crystal Mario Strikers Charged. Why am I back on this? Because I did not like the way that you have answered your MP at the beginning of VGR. I felt insulted.
I have been well ask you for proof here, for example:
http://www.vgr-fr.com/Mario-Kart-Wii-Contre-la-montre-Temps-Total-Supermarche-Coco-record-r32854.html
Valable reason : Glitch succeed?
But I'm not here to play the police. I do not know if the rest of the staff would agree with me: To take unfairly player while some have already seen play online and know that he is a formidable player. I saw the number of requests for evidence. 13 and already accepted another 19 to confirm. It éqivaut the tier of the game I thought: Okay! There is someone who harasses a player with DDP. Made beyond 25 evidence of a sudden. You do not think it unfair to your liking?
Staff : Do you think I made the right decision by refusing some evidence to reduce demand?
Staff : Pensez-vous que j'ai pris une bonne décision en refusant certaines preuves pour alléger la demande?
I can understand now why you were not able to provide me with proof of your shutout cut crystal Mario Strikers Charged. Why am I back on this? Because I did not like the way that you have answered your MP at the beginning of VGR. I felt insulted.
I have been well ask you for proof here, for example:
http://www.vgr-fr.com/Mario-Kart-Wii-Contre-la-montre-Temps-Total-Supermarche-Coco-record-r32854.html
Valable reason : Glitch succeed?
But I'm not here to play the police. I do not know if the rest of the staff would agree with me: To take unfairly player while some have already seen play online and know that he is a formidable player. I saw the number of requests for evidence. 13 and already accepted another 19 to confirm. It éqivaut the tier of the game I thought: Okay! There is someone who harasses a player with DDP. Made beyond 25 evidence of a sudden. You do not think it unfair to your liking?
Staff : Do you think I made the right decision by refusing some evidence to reduce demand?
Staff : Pensez-vous que j'ai pris une bonne décision en refusant certaines preuves pour alléger la demande?
20/11/2012 09:59
#42
Getting so many proof request annoys and fustrates me, most people know I'm not a cheater.
I think people should send me a message first before sending in an insane amount of proof request on a chart where I quit playing. Please think about this before going mad and spam the proof request button.
Also, if you send proof request to anyone on the flap chart, they will not be able to prove it either (this is also part of the fustration, why me?)
I think people should send me a message first before sending in an insane amount of proof request on a chart where I quit playing. Please think about this before going mad and spam the proof request button.
Also, if you send proof request to anyone on the flap chart, they will not be able to prove it either (this is also part of the fustration, why me?)
20/11/2012 12:37
#43
30/12/2012 14:18
#45
30/12/2012 15:41
#46
Nothing was done because there is nothing to be done.
We know you're not a cheater, you don't want to prove 5-6 scores - or can't they will be deactivated.
You are not the first and the last to have deactivated scores and precisely on stupid scores you cannot prove afterwards.
But maybe I have missed something in this thread because I don't understand your last sentence Division X.
pkaddict58, if I remember correctly we already speak about this but the policy of VGR is to give a second chance to a member but yes I don't understand why he kept his scores since he should have every of his DS games' records deleted.
We know you're not a cheater, you don't want to prove 5-6 scores - or can't they will be deactivated.
You are not the first and the last to have deactivated scores and precisely on stupid scores you cannot prove afterwards.
But maybe I have missed something in this thread because I don't understand your last sentence Division X.
pkaddict58, if I remember correctly we already speak about this but the policy of VGR is to give a second chance to a member but yes I don't understand why he kept his scores since he should have every of his DS games' records deleted.
31/12/2012 22:00
#47
You clearly did miss something, yes.
I had a screenshot on this record for ages, but someone REMOVED the picture and asked for a proof request. I call that corruption.
Also, in a previous post I stated that I had already proven this record but nothing has been done about it.
So, people are allowed to be douchebags and ask for 20 proofs in one day that everyone knows I can't prove?
I had a screenshot on this record for ages, but someone REMOVED the picture and asked for a proof request. I call that corruption.
Also, in a previous post I stated that I had already proven this record but nothing has been done about it.
So, people are allowed to be douchebags and ask for 20 proofs in one day that everyone knows I can't prove?
01/01/2013 02:02
#48
Division X :
So, people are allowed to be douchebags and ask for 20 proofs in one day that everyone knows I can't prove?
Short extract from VGR rules :
"To be valid, a record should be provable"
"You are not required to provide a proof of your record when you submit it. However, any member at any moment can ask you for a proof. "
"Douchebags" (very nice word, congratulations) can read. And you, can you read?
You submit records which are not saved in the game.
You know they aren't saved in the game.
You know that, when you submit scores on a website like VGR, anyone can ask for proves about these scores which are not saved in the game, according to VGR rules.
You know that your records will be deleted if you can't prove them.
- The only intelligent thing to do when you submit scores on a website like VGR is to be sure you can prove them afterwards, especially when scores are not saved : in that case you have to take a picture at the time. If you do like this there can't be any problem. If you don't, tears can happen afterwards indeed.
I think any "douchebag" could understand this reasoning. And you, can you?
Je continue en français pour m'excuser d'avance pour le ton employé mais là je n'ai pas trop apprécié le terme utilisé (que je ne connaissais pas d'ailleurs, le forum de VGR a donc pour moi l'intérêt supplémentaire de m'apprendre quelques nouveaux mots en anglais, mais pas forcément les plus faciles à utiliser dans une discussion courtoise).
Toujours est il que j'espère qu'il comprendra un jour que lorsque l'on soumet des scores sur un site internet pour les comparer à ceux d'autres joueurs il faut être capable de les prouver par la suite comme spécifié dans le règlement du site, et que l'on ne va pas forcément croire les joueurs, quels qu'ils soient, uniquement sur parole, en plus dans le cas d'un joueur actif ayant déjà eu des scores supprimés pour non réponse à une DDP et étant présent dans le top 100 points avec moins de 1% de scores prouvés.
Après une nouvelle fois je reconnais que 20 DDP d'un coup c'était peut être beaucoup. Le nombre était peut être trop élevé, mais il était à mon avis légitime d'en faire quelques unes dans ce cas précis.
01/01/2013 13:28
#49
Division X :
You clearly did miss something, yes.
I had a screenshot on this record for ages, but someone REMOVED the picture and asked for a proof request. I call that corruption.
Also, in a previous post I stated that I had already proven this record but nothing has been done about it.
So, people are allowed to be douchebags and ask for 20 proofs in one day that everyone knows I can't prove?
Okay maybe you missed something too: when a score is updated the proof "disappears" because it doesn't mean something to keep your 2:01.355 proved with this. The same goes for your 1:06.060 proved with this.
Anyway no one removed the picture. (we don't really have time to play and to loose five minutes a picture removed) I can understand that you are annoyed and angry but please don't be stupid.
If you want I can reactivate your scores with the old time and proof - it's the best I can do.
Visualizzazione da 41 a 49 di 49 elementi
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.